Comments on: Cuil.com spams our site to clean Google rep? http://blueprintds.com/2008/12/28/cuilcom-spams-our-site-to-clean-google-rep/ Design and Marketing implemented the right way. Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:49:26 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: bpdsbot http://blueprintds.com/2008/12/28/cuilcom-spams-our-site-to-clean-google-rep/comment-page-1/#comment-815 bpdsbot Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:20:17 +0000 http://blueprintds.com/?p=905#comment-815 @jonathan dingman We are pretty sure Cuil's not spamming our site but it is plausible they hired a company to do some massive link building. @jonathan dingman

We are pretty sure Cuil’s not spamming our site but it is plausible they hired a company to do some massive link building.

]]> By: Jonathan Dingman http://blueprintds.com/2008/12/28/cuilcom-spams-our-site-to-clean-google-rep/comment-page-1/#comment-814 Jonathan Dingman Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:59:31 +0000 http://blueprintds.com/?p=905#comment-814 Often, spammers are used to target forums, which, in this case, would be int he right syntax. I highly doubt it was actually cuil.com's owners spamming you. Every time you get an email from bill@microsoft.com telling you that you have a $1 million prize waiting, do you actually think it's Bill Gates emailing you? No. It's likely someone trying to make it appear like cuil.com is actually spamming, though in reality, it's not actually them. Often, spammers are used to target forums, which, in this case, would be int he right syntax.

I highly doubt it was actually cuil.com’s owners spamming you.

Every time you get an email from bill@microsoft.com telling you that you have a $1 million prize waiting, do you actually think it’s Bill Gates emailing you? No.

It’s likely someone trying to make it appear like cuil.com is actually spamming, though in reality, it’s not actually them.

]]> By: Adam http://blueprintds.com/2008/12/28/cuilcom-spams-our-site-to-clean-google-rep/comment-page-1/#comment-651 Adam Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:38:11 +0000 http://blueprintds.com/?p=905#comment-651 Is it me, or did they not even use the right syntax for the links? They probably employed the services of a freelancer from one of those freelance sites to 'optimise' (spam) their website address. Is it me, or did they not even use the right syntax for the links?
They probably employed the services of a freelancer from one of those freelance sites to ‘optimise’ (spam) their website address.

]]>